
You bought into Y Combinator, raised $20 million from a16z, after which exited to Meta? That’s cool, I assume. However did Soham Parekh apply to work at your startup?
There’s now a brand new badge of honor for startup founders: your proximity to at least one beforehand unknown Indian software program engineer named Soham Parekh.
The Anna Delvey of Silicon Valley was outed on Wednesday when former Mixpanel CEO Suhail Doshi posted on X to warn fellow founders about Parekh.
“PSA: there’s a man named Soham Parekh (in India) who works at 3-4 startups on the identical time. He’s been preying on YC firms and extra. Beware,” Doshi wrote. “I fired this man in his first week and advised him to cease mendacity/scamming individuals. He hasn’t stopped a 12 months later.”
Now, the publish has over 20 million views, with founders and buyers from throughout the tech business weighing in. And earlier than Andy Jassy asks — might this have all been averted if extra firms returned to the workplace? No, some persons are simply unhealthy managers.
Based on Doshi, no less than three founders have reached out to say that that they had fired or have been at present using Parekh.
Within the age of subreddit communities like r/overemployed, the place members speak about how you can get away with working a number of distant jobs without delay, this revelation isn’t all that stunning. What’s extra attention-grabbing is how extensively the responses to his actions differ (to be honest, nobody ever stated that the tech business was identified for its ethical fiber).
To some within the tech group, Parekh has the makings of a folks hero, deceiving well-funded startups and sticking it to the person. To others, he’s an immoral liar who screwed over startups and took jobs away from individuals who really would have given their all. Many are impressed by how he managed to get via so many notoriously aggressive interview processes, whereas others assume he ought to parlay his quarter-hour of fame into founding his personal startup.
“If Soham instantly comes clear and says he was working to coach an AI agent for information work, he raises at $100M pre by the weekend,” Field CEO Aaron Levie wrote on X.
Chris Bakke — the founding father of Laskie, a job-matching platform acquired by X — thinks that Soham ought to embrace his status.
“Soham Parekh wants to start out an interview prep firm. He’s clearly one of many biggest interviewers of all time,” Bakke wrote. “He ought to publicly acknowledge that he did one thing unhealthy and course right to the factor he’s prime 1% at.”
In the meantime, Y Combinator CEO Garry Tan took the chance to pat himself on the again.
“With out the YC group this man would nonetheless be working and would have perhaps by no means been caught,” Tan wrote. “The startup guild of YC is a vital invention to assist founders be extra profitable than they’d be alone.”
Why did he do it? Parekh says that this wasn’t a part of some grand plan — he claims he had no plan in any respect, and he was making an attempt to make some huge cash in a short time to get himself out of a foul monetary scenario.
“I actually didn’t assume this via,” Parekh stated in a dwell interview with TBPN. “It was an motion that was completed extra out of desperation.”
Parekh didn’t handle Doshi’s allegation that the majority of his resume was pretend.
“What’s additionally humorous is, , a few of the memes,” he stated. “I’m very new to Twitter. I joined Twitter yesterday, so this was a lesson for me in social media basically.” (Twitter has lengthy been often known as X, in fact.)
You don’t have at hand it to him, however he’s a reasonably good poster for somebody who’s been on the platform for a day. One in every of his few posts was a response to LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman, who requested what individuals assume Parekh’s LinkedIn header can be.
“I don’t have a LinkedIn,” Parekh replied.
For what it’s value, his X header is on the cash, even when he received’t trouble with LinkedIn. It’s the meme of Flynn Rider from the Disney film “Tangled” — a smug-looking man about to state a controversial opinion, surrounded by knives on all sides.