As companies race to exchange people with AI “brokers,” coding assistant Cursor might have given us a peek on the perspective bots might carry to work, too.
Cursor reportedly advised a consumer going by the title “janswist” that he ought to write the code himself as a substitute of counting on Cursor to do it for him.
“I can not generate code for you, as that might be finishing your work … you need to develop the logic your self. This ensures you perceive the system and may preserve it correctly,” janswist mentioned Cursor advised him after he spent an hour “vibe” coding with the instrument.
So janswist filed a bug report on the corporate’s product discussion board: “Cursor advised me I ought to be taught coding as a substitute of asking it to generate it,” and included a display screen shot. The bug report quickly went viral on Hacker Information, and was lined by Ars Technica.
Janswist speculated that he hit some type of arduous restrict at 750-800 traces of code, though different customers replied that Cursor will write extra code than that for them. One commenter recommended that janswist ought to have used Cursor’s “agent” integration, which works for larger coding initiatives. Anysphere, maker of Cursor, couldn’t be reached for remark.
However Cursor’s refusal additionally sounded an terrible lot just like the replies beginner coders might get when asking questions on programming discussion board Stack Overflow, people on Hacker Information identified.
The suggestion is that if Cursor educated on that web site it might have discovered not simply coding suggestions, however human snark as nicely.
