
The presidential race can have an enormous say on whether or not Poland performs within the EU’s massive league or if it retreats again into isolation alongside different populist-governed international locations in Central Europe like Hungary and Slovakia.
Throughout PiS’s eight years in energy it bought into fights with the EU and different allies over efforts to politicize the justice system, assaults on LGBTQ+ rights, tightening abortion guidelines and utilizing state cash for occasion goals. Nevertheless, it additionally directed a deluge of cash towards poorer voters and gave often-ignored individuals from smaller cities and villages a way that their extra conservative values have been necessary.
Is the president necessary?
Poland’s president is a largely ceremonial job — the incumbent will get to reside in a elaborate palace, indicators off on individuals changing into professors, generals and ambassadors, and is the commander-in-chief of the armed forces, though it’s the federal government that units overseas and army coverage, not the president. He can provoke laws.
However he does have actual energy — albeit of a adverse variety. A president can veto payments that may solely be overridden with a three-fifths majority in parliament. That’s a degree no occasion has in Poland’s deeply divided political panorama. The president also can ship laws to be analyzed by the Constitutional Tribunal, a prime courtroom, which is essentially equal to a veto.
Tusk spelled out the perks of the job in 2010: “honors, chandeliers, a palace and a veto.”
PiS-backed President Duda has blocked a lot of Tusk’s legislative agenda, resulting in rising frustration amongst his voters and one of many causes that the federal government is seeing a gentle fall in public assist.