India has granted authorized standing to tens of millions of gig and platform employees below its newly carried out labor legal guidelines, marking a milestone for the nation’s supply, ride-hailing, and e-commerce workforce — but with advantages nonetheless unclear and platforms starting to evaluate their obligations, entry to social safety stays out of attain.
The popularity stems from the Code on Social Safety — considered one of 4 labor legal guidelines the Indian authorities introduced into impact on Friday, greater than 5 years after the parliament first handed them in 2020. It’s the solely a part of the brand new framework that addresses gig and platform employees, because the remaining three codes — overlaying wages, industrial relations, and office security — don’t lengthen minimal earnings, employment protections, or working-condition ensures to this quickly increasing workforce.
India has one of many world’s largest and fastest-growing gig economies, with business estimates suggesting that greater than 12 million folks ship meals, drive ride-hailing cabs, type e-commerce packages, and carry out different on-demand providers for digital platforms. The sector has change into a essential supply of employment, particularly for younger and migrant employees shut out of formal job markets, and is projected to develop additional as firms scale logistics, retail, and hyperlocal supply.
Firms, from Amazon and Walmart-owned Flipkart to Indian quick-delivery apps reminiscent of Swiggy, Everlasting’s Blinkit, and Zepto, in addition to ride-hailing corporations together with Uber, Ola, and Rapido, depend on gig employees to run their companies within the South Asian nation — the world’s second-largest web and smartphone market after China. But regardless of powering a few of India’s Most worthy tech companies, most gig employees function outdoors conventional labor protections and lack entry to fundamental social safety.
The newly carried out labor legal guidelines are meant to alter that, by defining gig and platform employees in statute and requiring aggregators, reminiscent of food-delivery and ride-hailing platforms, to contribute 1-2% of their annual income (capped at 5% of funds made to such employees) to a government-managed social safety fund. However the particulars stay murky: What actual advantages will truly be provided, how employees will entry them, and the way contributions shall be tracked throughout a number of platforms, and when payouts will start all stay unclear, elevating considerations that significant protections could take years to materialize.
The Code on Social Safety creates a authorized framework for gig employees to be coated below schemes such because the Staff’ State Insurance coverage, provident fund, and government-backed insurance coverage. Nevertheless, the extent of those advantages — together with eligibility, contribution ranges, and supply mechanisms — stays unclear and can depend upon future guidelines and scheme notifications.
A key a part of the framework is the creation of Social Safety Boards at each the central and state ranges, tasked with designing and overseeing welfare schemes for gig and platform employees. The central board should embrace 5 representatives of gig and platform employees and 5 representatives of aggregators, all nominated by the federal government, alongside senior officers, specialists, and state representatives, per the Code. However there’s little readability on how choices shall be made, how a lot affect employee representatives will even have, or who will finally management choices on funding and profit supply.
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco
|
October 13-15, 2026
“We have to wait and see what precisely is within the authorities’s thoughts in relation to implementing the 4 Codes, and what it hopes to do for gig employees,” mentioned Balaji Parthasarathy, a professor at IIIT Bangalore and principal investigator of the Fairwork India mission. “After which we additionally should see what the states translate on the bottom.”
Parthasarathy famous that as a result of labor coverage in India is shared between the federal and state governments — listed within the “concurrent record” of the Indian Structure — state governments are liable for designing, notifying, and administering most of the schemes wanted to make the Code on Social Safety operational for gig employees.
That raises the potential of uneven entry, as some states transfer shortly to determine social safety boards and roll out mechanisms, whereas others delay or deprioritize the trouble because of political or fiscal constraints. Latest examples — reminiscent of Rajasthan’s stalled laws after it was handed in 2023, and Karnataka’s Gig Staff Act, which was carried out quickly after clearing the state meeting — underscore how employees’ protections could finally depend upon the place they dwell quite than the legislation itself.
Platform firms have publicly welcomed the reform, however are nonetheless largely evaluating what it can require of them. An Amazon India spokesperson instructed TechCrunch the corporate helps the Indian authorities’s intent behind the labor overhaul and is evaluating the adjustments it might want to introduce. A spokesperson for Zepto mentioned the corporate welcomes the brand new labor codes as “an enormous step towards clearer, easier guidelines that shield employees whereas supporting ease of doing enterprise,” including that the adjustments will assist strengthen social safety for its supply companions with out undermining the pliability that quick-commerce operations depend on.
Meals supply agency Everlasting, previously referred to as Zomato, mentioned in a inventory change submitting that the Social Safety Code is a step towards extra uniform guidelines and that it doesn’t count on the monetary affect to threaten its long-term enterprise.
Nonetheless, Aprajita Rana, a associate at company legislation agency AZB & Companions, mentioned the change “will naturally have a monetary affect” on India’s e-commerce sector, as employee contributions at the moment are being formalized. It can additionally create new compliance obligations, requiring firms to make sure all employees of their networks are registered with the government-managed fund, decide whether or not people are related to a number of aggregators and find out how to keep away from duplicative advantages, and arrange inner grievance mechanisms.
“Whereas the legislation has the proper intent, gig employee buildings in India are fairly novel, and sensible challenges in compliance will emerge because the legislation takes drive,” Rana instructed TechCrunch.
One of many greatest hurdles for gig employees searching for advantages below the newly carried out legislation shall be registering on the Indian authorities’s E-Shram portal, launched in 2021 as a nationwide database of unorganized employees. The portal had registered greater than 300,000 platform employees as of the top of August, regardless that the federal government estimates India’s gig workforce at round 10 million. Commerce unions, together with the Indian Federation of App-Primarily based Transport Staff (IFAT), which has greater than 70,000 members, are working to assist gig employees enroll to allow them to entry the advantages.
Ambika Tandon, a PhD candidate on the College of Cambridge and an affiliate of the nationwide commerce union Centre of Indian Commerce Unions (CITU), mentioned registering on the portal may imply misplaced wages for gig employees, since they must take break day to fill in required particulars.
“These employees work for 16 hours a day,” she instructed TechCrunch. “They don’t have time to go and register themselves on the federal government portal.”
CITU can also be among the many 10 main Indian commerce unions calling for the withdrawal of the brand new labor legal guidelines, forward of nationwide protests deliberate for Wednesday.
The advantages of registering on the E-Shram portal will not be compelling for a lot of gig employees, Tandon famous, as a result of the legislation doesn’t handle extra instant considerations reminiscent of fluctuating earnings, account suspensions, and sudden termination of accounts — points that employees say matter way more proper now than entry to insurance coverage or provident fund advantages.
Commerce unions typically arrange strikes to push platforms to handle these considerations instantly. Nevertheless, such actions can disrupt everybody concerned, together with shoppers, and put employees at additional danger, as they don’t seem to be paid whereas placing and will even face termination for taking part.
“Whereas the social safety guidelines have now been put in place, we demand a minimal wage and an employer-employee relationship for gig and platform employees, that are but to be set by the federal government,” mentioned Shaik Salauddin, founder president of the Telangana Gig and Platform Staff Union (TGPWU), which has greater than 10,000 members within the southern state of Telangana, and nationwide normal secretary of IFAT. “We urge the federal government to acquire information from aggregators and safe their financial contributions to the fund to start out providing advantages to employees.”
There’s a broader debate over whether or not gig employees needs to be handled as workers — a query the brand new labor legal guidelines don’t handle. The Social Safety Code defines gig and platform employees as a separate class, quite than extending them the rights and protections that include worker standing. In distinction, courts and regulators in markets such because the U.Okay., Spain, and New Zealand have moved towards recognizing platform employees as workers or “employees,” entitled to minimal wages, paid depart, and different advantages. In some U.S. jurisdictions, regulators and courts have pushed for platform employees to be handled as workers or equally protected employees, although many ride-hail and supply drivers stay labeled as impartial contractors.
“With this legislation, the Indian authorities has settled this debate by saying that these gig employees don’t sit inside the ambit of employment or different protections,” Tandon mentioned.
The Indian labor ministry didn’t reply to a request for remark.
